Man on a Ladder

Gordon W. Bess–Danville’s oldest man at 92 and climbing

By Sharon Lakey

For pho­to album, gath­ered and shared by Lin­da Bess, Gor­don and Ger­ry’s daugh­ter,  click here: Gor­don Bess

Danville - Gordon scrapping paint
Gor­don learned paint­ing and wall­pa­per­ing from his father and for many years was seen work­ing on his very tall house on Brain­erd Street in Danville.

Gor­don Bess is an orga­nized man. He cred­its this to his twen­ty-year mil­i­tary career. He was born and raised in Meri­den, Con­necti­cut, known as the Sil­ver City. His younger broth­er, Ronald, was also a mil­i­tary man, join­ing the Marine Corps and serv­ing dur­ing the Kore­an War. Ronald is still liv­ing in Meri­den. Gordon’s younger sis­ter, Lois, died in Jan­u­ary 2004 at the age of 81.

April, 1863–The North Star Takes a Shot at Thurlow Weed and Laments the Firing of Gen. George McClellan

By Gary Far­row, Danville His­tor­i­cal Society

Des­per­a­tion over the war effort con­tin­ued to be one of main themes in the North Star’s report­ing and opin­ion columns. The paper’s com­men­tary also brings its polit­i­cal stripes into clear­er focus.

April 4, 1863 North Star, Government Expenses

The New­bury­port Her­ald says our nation­al expens­es since this war com­menced have been greater than from the ori­gin of the Gov­ern­ment down to 1861, a peri­od of sev­en­ty-two years. Our whole nation expens­es to the time of the rebel­lion, includ­ing the war with Eng­land, the Mex­i­can war, and our many Indi­an wars, were $1,353,785,000: and were the war to cease now no one imag­ines that our debt would be less than $2,009,000,000 cre­at­ed in less than two years…

Every day since the war began our expens­es have increased. Mil­lions are vot­ed by Con­gress for eman­ci­pa­tion pur­pos­es, Pacif­ic Rail­roads, and any­thing, and every­thing, and where the lim­it might be reached, or what will be the end, Heav­en only knows.

March 1863–Amidst Unspeakable Cruelty, the North Star Struggles with Desperation, Racism and Hope

By Gary Far­row, Danville His­tor­i­cal Society

March 7,1863 North Star, Our Negro Troops

A recruiting poster for soldiers of African descent
A recruit­ing poster for sol­diers of African descent

Our New Orleans cor­re­spon­dent con­firms the rumors which have been cur­rent as to dif­fi­cul­ties between the white and black reg­i­ments at Ship Island and Baton Rouge in the Depart­ment of the Gulf. We see no rea­son why this state of things should be allowed to spring up. White and black troops should not be brigad­ed togeth­er or sta­tioned togeth­er. The Procla­ma­tion spec­i­fied the use to which black troops should be pri­mar­i­ly put, when raised, as “gar­rison­ing forts and posi­tions,” and there are forts enough in our hands in the Gulf Depart­ment to fur­nish duty for ten times the num­ber of black troops we have there…

When the sick­ly weath­er comes on in the Gulf and on the riv­er, our white sol­diers will be glad enough to have this work tak­en off their hands by the accli­mat­ed negroes; and there will be no quar­relling for prece­dence in the duty.…

We need not doubt that Col. Higginson’s black bat­tal­ion exhib­it­ed all the “fiery ener­gy” which can be claimed for them: but the greater part of the men of the South will require a great deal of dis­ci­pline and train­ing before their fiery ener­gy can be relied on in the field of battle.

February 1863–Was the Danville North Star a Copperhead?

A Copperhead cartoon
A Cop­per­head cartoon

By Gary Far­row, Danville His­tor­i­cal Society

The North Star was not abo­li­tion­ist. Dur­ing the War, polit­i­cal posi­tions arose along a con­tin­u­um. On one end of the spec­trum were Rad­i­cal Abo­li­tion­ists, who saw slav­ery as a moral imper­a­tive that must tri­umph at all costs; on the oth­er were the Peace Democ­rats or Cop­per­heads, who want­ed peace with the Con­fed­er­ates at any price. In between were the War Democ­rats, who reject­ed the Cop­per­heads fac­tion that con­trolled the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty. These War Democ­rats joined with the Repub­li­cans to sup­port the war effort against the South. Lincoln’s Eman­ci­pa­tion Procla­ma­tion, which freed slaves in all rebel states, had just tak­en effect in Jan­u­ary. Now in Feb­ru­ary, the North Star became more explic­it about where it stood.

February 21,1863 North Star, What is Radicalism?

The abolitionist, Charles Sumner.
The abo­li­tion­ist, Charles Sumner.

Wen­dell Phillips defined Rad­i­cal­ism in a late speech at Ply­mouth Church, when he said: -“Now, I would accept any­thing on an anti­slav­ery basis. I would accept sep­a­ra­tion. I would accept com­pro­mise. I would accept peace, and pay the whole Con­fed­er­ate debt at par on an anti­slav­ery basis. On that basis, I have touched the hard path of Nation­al exis­tence. I have reached the gran­ite stra­ta, and may begin to build agrar­i­an peace. And until I reach that no chi­canery of par­ties, no inge­nu­ity of com­pro­mise, no man­ner of sep­a­ra­tion can make any dif­fer­ence. We are in for the war.”

January 1863–Congress Looks Into Fredericksburg Amid Low Public Confidence

By Gary Far­row, Danville His­tor­i­cal Society

The completed pontoon bridge necessary for troop movement into Fredericksburg .
The com­plet­ed pon­toon bridge nec­es­sary for troop move­ment into Fredericksburg .

The events of late fall — ear­ly win­ter had brought the North to a low point. Although the army expe­ri­enced some suc­cess in the West, the war in the Vir­ginia the­atre had seen one North­ern deba­cle after another.

iwadebe001p1
Ohio’s Ben Wade, chair of the Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee look­ing into Fredericksburg.

The Con­gress’ Joint Com­mit­tee on the Con­duct of the War, which was estab­lished in 1861 and chaired by Ohio’s Ben Wade, was now look­ing into the loss at Fred­er­icks­burg. Over time the com­mit­tee had become iden­ti­fied with the Rad­i­cal Repub­li­cans, who were at odds with the admin­is­tra­tion over the lack of an aggres­sive war effort.

January 3, 1863 North Star, The Fredericksburg Disaster

The evi­dence in the report of the com­mit­tee for inves­ti­gat­ing the dis­as­ter of Fred­er­icks­burg fix­es def­i­nite­ly the respon­si­bil­i­ty for the con­se­quences of not cross­ing the Rap­pa­han­nock at once. It besides makes rev­e­la­tions that are painful and can­not fail to sink deep into the pub­lic mind.