Thaddeus Stevens in the Limelight–Early Life in Danville

By Paul Chouinard

Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Stevens in Spielberg's Lincoln
Tom­my Lee Jones as Thad­deus Stevens in Spiel­berg’s Lincoln

thaddeus 1Thad­deus Stevens has recent­ly been fea­tured in Steven Spielberg’s, Lin­coln, released nation­wide on Novem­ber 16, 2012, and was nom­i­nat­ed for twelve Oscar nom­i­na­tions. In Spielberg’s film, based on Amer­i­can his­to­ri­an Doris Kearns Goodwin’s, Team of Rivals: The Polit­i­cal Genius of Abra­ham Lin­coln, Thad­deus Stevens is por­trayed by Tom­my Lee Jones. It is the first time since his death in 1868 that he has been por­trayed in an objec­tive, his­tor­i­cal­ly accu­rate manner.

For years Stevens’ rep­u­ta­tion has suf­fered as a result of his por­tray­al of the thin­ly dis­guised char­ac­ter, Austin Stone­man, a fanat­i­cal vil­lain in D.W. Griffith’s land­mark silent film Birth of a Nation. Dur­ing the 1940s, Stevens was por­trayed as a vil­lain in Ten­nessee John­son, a bio­graph­i­cal film about Pres­i­dent Andrew John­son. As the antag­o­nist in both films, Stevens is por­trayed as an unrea­son­able, hos­tile, adver­sar­i­al indi­vid­ual who would let noth­ing stand in his way to meet his goal of pun­ish­ing the South and insur­ing the rights of the freed­men through his vision of Reconstruction.

Spielberg’s Lin­coln focus­es on divi­sions with­in Lincoln’s cab­i­net and the acri­mo­nious debate with­in Con­gress, dur­ing the last year of the war, over the pas­sage of the 13th Amend­ment to the Con­sti­tu­tion free­ing the slaves. The fear that the legal­i­ty of the Eman­ci­pa­tion Procla­ma­tion might be chal­lenged by the south­ern states, once they were read­mit­ted to the Union, made the pas­sage of the 13th Amend­ment essen­tial. While the Eman­ci­pa­tion Procla­ma­tion had freed the slaves, the 13th Amend­ment made slav­ery ille­gal forever.

Daniel Day-Lewis is mas­ter­ful in his por­tray­al of Lin­coln as the ulti­mate politi­cian who used his intel­li­gence, along with his wit and will­ing­ness to com­pro­mise, to achieve his goal. Tom­my Lee Jones is out­stand­ing in his por­tray­al of Thad­deus Stevens as the stub­born, tena­cious leader of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives who used his acidic wit and excep­tion­al ora­tor­i­cal skills, along with every tool with­in his pow­er, to achieve his goal of pas­sage of the 13th Amend­ment. Spiel­berg cap­tures the pow­er strug­gle between Lin­coln and Stevens, who by 1865 regard­ed the Pres­i­dent as “the capit­u­lat­ing com­pro­miser, the dawdler.”

Spielberg’s Lin­coln has con­tributed to a more pos­i­tive image of Thad­deus Stevens as a dom­i­nant con­gres­sion­al leader dur­ing the Civ­il War and Recon­struc­tion peri­od, as well as a sem­i­nal leader of the Civ­il Rights move­ment. Inter­est in his ear­ly life in Ver­mont has inten­si­fied since the release of the film.

In the 220 years since the birth of Thad­deus Stevens, in 1792, in Danville Cen­ter (the area at the top of Dole Hill near Sug­ar Ridge Camp­ground and extend­ing south and east to the val­leys), he has remained a rel­a­tive­ly obscure indi­vid­ual in Ver­mont his­to­ry. He has, how­ev­er, received noto­ri­ety in Penn­syl­va­nia where he moved as a young man. His pub­lic life as a teacher, attor­ney, leg­is­la­tor, U.S. Con­gress­man and as Chair­man of the U.S. House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives, Ways and Means Com­mit­tee dur­ing the Civ­il War and leader of Rad­i­cal Recon­struc­tion in the House, fol­low­ing the War, has con­tributed to his acclaim in Pennsylvania.

EARLY LIFE IN DANVILLE

Artist and historian, Robin Rothman, created a rendering of the old bark meetinghouse that was located in Danville Center. Thaddeus and his family would have attended Baptist church services here as their pitch was located nearby.
Artist and his­to­ri­an, Robin Roth­man, cre­at­ed a ren­der­ing of the old bark meet­ing­house that was locat­ed in Danville Cen­ter. Thad­deus and his fam­i­ly would have attend­ed Bap­tist church ser­vices here as their pitch was locat­ed nearby.

Joshua and Sarah Mor­rill Stevens of Methuen, Mass­a­chu­setts, arrived in Danville Cen­ter around 1786. Danville had received its char­ter on Octo­ber 31, 1786 from the Ver­mont Leg­is­la­ture which was meet­ing in Rut­land that year. Once the peti­tion for the char­ter was grant­ed, the for­mer name of Hills­bor­ough, con­nect­ed to the New York grant, ceased to have mean­ing. The legal dis­ap­pear­ance of Hills­bor­ough, com­bined with the casu­al­ness of the ear­ly record keep­ing, helped to obscure the con­nec­tion between the New York grant and the new­ly arrived settlers.

Joshua and Sarah were among Danville’s ear­ly set­tlers to arrive in this fron­tier area of forest­ed wilder­ness. There were approx­i­mate­ly 50 fam­i­lies in Danville in 1786. A shoe­mak­er and sur­vey­or by trade, Joshua began by clear­ing the land to engage in sub­sis­tence agri­cul­ture. Trans­form­ing a 100-acre lot of forest­ed wilder­ness into suit­able fields for rais­ing crops was a long, ardu­ous process. The first offi­cial sur­vey of Danville was under­tak­en by Eben Thomp­son in 1787. In 1790 Danville offi­cials hired Joshua to resur­vey the town. He altered the for­mer lines of the first sur­vey slight­ly; his became the offi­cial town survey.

The young cou­ple first became par­ents in 1790 with the birth of Joshua, who was born with two club feet. His birth was fol­lowed in 1792 by Thad­deus, who was born with one club foot. It is believed that Joshua and Sarah named their son Thad­deus in hon­or of Thad­deus Kosciuszko of Poland. He came to Amer­i­ca in 1776 to offer his engi­neer­ing ser­vices for for­ti­fy­ing bat­tle sites that became piv­otal in the Amer­i­can Rev­o­lu­tion. A third son, Abn­er Mor­rill, named for Sarah’s father was born two years lat­er and a fourth, Alan­son, three years thereafter.

There is no doubt that the birth of two sons with severe phys­i­cal dis­abil­i­ties had a pro­found influ­ence on their father, who prid­ed him­self for his prowess as a wrestler. It can be rea­son­ably assumed that his mas­culin­i­ty was wound­ed. In any gen­er­a­tion this bur­den would have been a tragedy, but at that time, based on Calvin­ist tra­di­tion, it was looked upon as a pun­ish­ment from God for some secret sin. In any of Joshua Stevens’ roles in soci­ety as a farmer, cob­bler, sur­vey­or, or wrestler, he could hard­ly escape the real­i­ty of his sons’ dis­abil­i­ties. After the birth of his fourth son, Joshua took to liquor and began stray­ing away from home more and more fre­quent­ly. He con­tributed lit­tle to the sup­port of the house­hold. About 1804 he dis­ap­peared altogether.

Upon Sarah Mor­rill Stevens fell the bur­den of rais­ing four boys. Accord­ing to Oliv­er J. Dick­ey, rep­re­sen­ta­tive from PA in con­gress and a for­mer law stu­dent of Thad­deus’, she was “a woman of great ener­gy, strong will, and deep piety.” As a fam­i­ly mem­ber of respect­ed Rev­o­lu­tion­ary War vet­er­ans and a young woman com­mit­ted to her Bap­tist val­ues, she received strong sup­port from her fam­i­ly and com­mu­ni­ty. Fol­low­ing Joshua’s depar­ture she con­tin­ued farm­ing and sup­ple­ment­ed her income by nurs­ing the sick, though much of the lat­ter she did gratuitously.

Abn­er and Sarah Hoyt Mor­rill, Sarah’s moth­er and father lived near­by, as did her uncle Abel and his wife, Eliz­a­beth Hib­bard Mor­rill, her uncle, Jere­mi­ah and his wife, Han­nah Kit­tridge Mor­rill, her uncle, Joseph and his wife Ann Var­num Mor­rill as well as a maid­en aunt, Abi­gail Mor­rill. We can assume that as a young moth­er, along with her sons, Sarah had the ben­e­fit of a strong, sup­port­ive family.

In 1792 a piv­otal deci­sion was influ­enced by Ver­mont Chief Jus­tice William Cham­ber­lain of Peacham that would impact on Thad­deus Stevens’ future. A dis­pute arose between Danville and Peacham as to which should be the shire town of the new­ly des­ig­nat­ed Cale­do­nia Coun­ty. Both towns felt they had a bet­ter claim. A com­pro­mise was pro­posed by Chief Jus­tice Cham­ber­lain that led to the estab­lish­ment of Danville as the shire town and Peacham as the loca­tion for the coun­ty gram­mar school. Danville was offi­cial­ly made the shire town on Novem­ber 8, 1796 and remained such until 1855. From that point on, Danville Green would Danville Cen­ter as the pri­ma­ry vil­lage of the town. This deci­sion would have a major impact on Thad­deus Stevens by expos­ing him ear­ly in life to the leg­isla­tive process and in pro­vid­ing him with an oppor­tu­ni­ty for a gram­mar school education.

1805 was an impor­tant year in Danville’s his­to­ry for two rea­sons. The Leg­is­la­ture would meet in Danville as its des­ig­nat­ed shire town loca­tion, and Danville expe­ri­enced a spot­ted fever epi­dem­ic that swept Ver­mont. 1805 was also an impor­tant year for Thad­deus Stevens. He was thir­teen years old, a bright, pre­co­cious ado­les­cent, who was in the right place at the right time. About 1804, Sarah sold her farm and moved the fam­i­ly from Danville Cen­ter to live with her cousin, James. He was a miller who lived in Mor­rill Vil­lage, known today as Greenbank’s Hol­low. In exchange for pro­vid­ing a home for her fam­i­ly, Sarah ren­dered house­keep­ing ser­vices for her cousin. The fam­i­ly lived on the west side of the road, just north of Joe’s Brook, near the cov­ered bridge. This placed Thad­deus with­in walk­ing dis­tance of Danville Green.

Though there is no proof that this was Morrill's gristmill, it was the gristmill in Greenbank's Hollow and was a very old building. It is now gone, but the site is available to view at the historic park.
Though there is no proof that this was Mor­ril­l’s grist­mill, it was the grist­mill in Green­bank’s Hol­low and was a very old build­ing. It is now gone, but the site is avail­able to view at the his­toric park.

Sarah’s cousin, Abra­ham Mor­rill, a Rev­o­lu­tion­ary War vet­er­an, was Danville’s first Town Clerk and also elect­ed as the town’s first rep­re­sen­ta­tive to the Gen­er­al Assem­bly. About two hun­dred leg­is­la­tors descend­ed on Danville to attend the 1805 leg­isla­tive ses­sion. There were only about twen­ty homes in close prox­im­i­ty to Danville Green at the time, which result­ed in the fact that many leg­is­la­tors board­ed with fam­i­lies in the out­ly­ing areas. The leg­is­la­ture met at the cour­t­house, while the gov­er­nor and coun­cil met at Sarah’s uncle, Abel Morril’s, tav­ern that was locat­ed just north of the ceme­tery. It was at this ses­sion that the leg­is­la­ture con­sid­ered the des­ig­na­tion of a loca­tion for the state capitol.

Mont­pe­lier was cho­sen as the capi­tol. The leg­is­la­ture would meet in the shire towns of Mid­dle­bury in 1806 and Wood­stock in 1807. In 1808 the first leg­isla­tive ses­sion was held in the new­ly com­plet­ed State House in Montpelier.

Anoth­er impor­tant issue con­sid­ered by the leg­is­la­ture in 1805 was a pro­posed amend­ment to the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion to end the slave trade. Gov­er­nor Tichenor, in his annu­al mes­sage, endorsed the pro­posed amend­ment to the Con­sti­tu­tion of the Unit­ed States. One hun­dred and ten Fed­er­al­ists and sev­en­ty-one Repub­li­cans unit­ed in declar­ing that “uni­ver­sal free­dom is one of those fun­da­men­tal prin­ci­ples of our polit­i­cal insti­tu­tions which are engraven on the mind and live in the affec­tions of every true Amer­i­can. And although our coun­try is already infest­ed with slav­ery, the tol­er­a­tion of which might seem to con­tra­vene the gen­er­al sys­tem of our pol­i­cy, we trust that the human­i­ty and jus­tice of our coun­try will pre­vent the increase of the dep­re­cat­ed evil, and arrest, as soon as pos­si­ble, that exe­crable traf­fic in human flesh.” The pro­posed amend­ment was nev­er adopt­ed since it was not rat­i­fied by three-fourths of the states as required by the Constitution.

At the same time the Leg­is­la­ture was meet­ing, many Danville res­i­dents con­tract­ed spot­ted fever. Sarah Mor­rill Stevens was busy night and day pro­vid­ing nurs­ing ser­vices to the patients. Thad­deus expressed a desire to help her care for those who were ill. He proved so capa­ble and con­sci­en­tious that she would often leave him in charge of one patient while she went to look after anoth­er. His involve­ment in assist­ing his moth­er gave him the oppor­tu­ni­ty to trav­el through­out the town and meet many peo­ple. Thus at an ear­ly age he saw much of pover­ty and afflic­tion. In lat­er life he devel­oped pro­found empa­thy for indi­vid­u­als afflict­ed by want and suffering.

There is no direct evi­dence to point to the fact that Thad­deus Stevens had any con­tact with leg­is­la­tors or the oppor­tu­ni­ty to gain knowl­edge of issues being con­sid­ered by the leg­is­la­ture. How­ev­er, as a high­ly intel­li­gent thir­teen-year-old, it seems unlike­ly that Thad­deus remained unin­formed of what was tak­ing place. Giv­en the fact that his mother’s cousin had rep­re­sent­ed Danville in the Gen­er­al Assem­bly and his uncle owned the tav­ern where the gov­er­nor and his coun­cil were meet­ing, it seems like­ly that Thad­deus would be aware of what was tak­ing place.

This may very well have been his first oppor­tu­ni­ty to con­sid­er the many issues relat­ed to slav­ery that would ulti­mate­ly pre­oc­cu­py his focus and leg­isla­tive ini­tia­tives as a mem­ber of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives in the U.S. Congress.

(Sources list­ed after third installment)

 

 

 

Share