September 1863–New Depths of Inhumanity Attained, Southern Noose Tightens and Wiggles

By Gary Far­row, Danville His­tor­i­cal Society

The atrocities of war--This drawing of the Sack of Lawrence Kansas was just one of the many.
The atroc­i­ties of war–This draw­ing of the sack of Lawrence, Kansas, was just one of many.

Sep­tem­ber brought news about how the Union dealt with its desert­ers. Two men on oppo­site sides, whose twist­ed souls were fired ear­li­er in the caul­dron that was the Kansas-Mis­souri Bor­der War, led their “troops” on a mis­sion of mur­der­ing, ran­sack­ing and plun­der­ing non-com­bat­ants. The bat­tle for East­ern Ten­nessee — North­ern Geor­gia con­tin­ued to heave to and fro.

September 5, 1863 Danville North Star

Mil­i­tary Expectations

Head­quar­ters Army of the Potomac Aug 29 – The exe­cu­tion of sub­sti­tute desert­ers sen­tenced to death in Gen­er­al Orders No. 84 took place today. More than ordi­nary inter­est was exhib­it­ed on the exe­cu­tion of mil­i­tary law, and it is esti­mat­ed that not less than 25,000 per­sons were present…The ground was select­ed, and every arrange­ment so com­plete that no acci­dents occurred to mar the solem­ni­ty of the proceedings….

The crim­i­nals were sit­ting upon their respec­tive coffins with yawn­ing graves in their rear…. At the order to fire, 86 mus­kets were dis­charged, and instant death was announced by the Sur­geons in atten­dance as a result. The bod­ies were then placed in their respec­tive graves, and the cler­gy per­formed the last reli­gious rites over the deceased.

The names, ages, res­i­dence, etc., of the deceased are as fol­lows – George Kuh­na, Hanover­ian, 22 years old, Penn­syl­va­nia, unmar­ried; John Felan, Ital­ian, 26 years old, Penn­syl­va­nia, wife and fam­i­ly; Charles Wal­ter, Pruss­ian 28 years old, wife and child; George Reinese, Ital­ian, 24 years old, wife and child; Emile Lai, Pruss­ian, 30 years old, wife.

***

Sub­sti­tutes, those who agreed to go into the army as a replace­ment for some­one else who had been draft­ed, were noto­ri­ous­ly less enthu­si­as­tic about their ser­vice than those who vol­un­teered or accept­ed the draft. Robert E. Lee lament­ed that mil­i­tary dis­ci­pline was com­pro­mised because the South’s pol­i­cy for pun­ish­ing desert­ers was much too lenient because exe­cu­tion was not per­mit­ted. The North brooked no such restraint.

The South began draft­ing men in ’62; the North in ’63. Both sides encour­aged the oth­ers’ troops to desert. Each had their own incen­tive pro­gram. The South offered Union troops sanc­tu­ary below the Mason-Dixon line, civil­ian jobs and, in some cas­es, land. The Union car­rots includ­ed trans­porta­tion behind Union lines and full mar­ket val­ue com­pen­sa­tion for mil­i­tary equip­ment brought with them. South­ern desert­ers also had the option of liv­ing in the North or join­ing the army to fight Indi­ans on the west­ern fron­tier. Through­out the war, the num­ber of deser­tions was quite high with the totals being 200,000 Union troops and 104,000 rebels.

The Lawrence Massacre

The mas­sacre at Lawrence [Kansas] has nat­u­ral­ly excit­ed the deep­est hor­ror. The bru­tal­i­ty, the cold-blood­ed feroc­i­ty of the mis­cre­ants, who could per­pe­trate such revolt­ing bar­bar­i­ty, can­not be too severe­ly pun­ished. Two hun­dred – some accounts place the num­ber at three hun­dred – cit­i­zens butchered at their hearth­stones, penned in like cat­tle and delib­er­ate­ly shot down, wid­ows and orphans ren­dered home­less and pen­ni­less, prop­er­ty ruth­less­ly destroyed, a com­mu­ni­ty par­a­lyzed by hor­ror such are the results of Quantrell’s bloody work….

William Quantrill, who was responsible for the sack of Lawrence, KS.
William Quantrill, who was respon­si­ble for the sack of Lawrence, KS.

That Quantrell’s act will be severe­ly denounced at Rich­mond. Sure­ly, no act of loy­al men demand­ed such dia­bol­i­cal retal­i­a­tion as this Lawrence affair and unless Davis [Pres­i­dent of the Con­fed­er­a­cy] imme­di­ate­ly inflicts the sever­est penal­ty upon the bar­bar­ian leader, the whole world will point the fin­ger of detes­ta­tion at him and his Confederacy….

The hor­ri­ble war­fare prac­ticed by Quantrell is not dis­sim­i­lar to the oper­a­tions which under Montgomery’s lead­er­ship have dis­graced our arms. The unnec­es­sary burn­ing and plun­der­ing his black troops have been guilty of have not yet been offi­cial­ly rep­ri­mand­ed by the Admin­is­tra­tion. Abo­li­tion news­pa­pers have glo­ri­fied the atroc­i­ties at Bluffton and oth­er places in South Carolina…

Mont­gomery even retains his com­mand, free to take more use­less …The jay-hawk­er Mont­gomery is not one whit bet­ter than Quantrell. The army needs no such men, whose acts only afford a pre­text for sav­agery which has made Lawrence a heap of smok­ing ruins; the cause is hin­dered by them, and human­i­ty made to blush at the guilt that leaves them in authority.

***

The trou­ble in Kansas came out of the 1850’s proxy war over slav­ery that was fought in Kansas and on its bor­der with Mis­souri. Dur­ing this peri­od, “Free state” inter­ests fund­ed by the North and slave inter­ests fund­ed by the South fought a heinous gueril­la war against one anoth­er. The first was the infa­mous and unhinged John Brown, sup­port­ed by Abo­li­tion­ists in Boston, who would attempt to incite a slave rebel­lion in Harper’s Fer­ry, Vir­ginia. He came with his adult sons to Kansas where they pro­ceed­ed to slaugh­ter five slave sup­port­ers with swords. After­wards, he was hung for his trouble.

Quantrill and his thugs fought on behalf of the slavers and were brought into the Con­fed­er­ate army when the Civ­il War erupt­ed. He con­tin­ued to con­duct gueril­la war­fare against Union sym­pa­thiz­ers and explained his mur­der of 150 men in Lawrence as pay­back for a sim­i­lar inci­dent which had occurred in his home­town of Osce­o­la, Mis­souri back 1861. He can also claim cred­it for tutor­ing mem­bers of the James-Younger gang, who went on to greater fame after the war by rob­bing banks and trains.

James_Montgomery
Union Colonel James Mont­gomery was also a prod­uct of the “Bleed­ing Kansas” con­flict where he became a “Jay­hawk­er,” the term used to describe a guer­ril­la combatant.

Union Colonel James Mont­gomery was also a prod­uct of the “Bleed­ing Kansas” con­flict where he became a “Jay­hawk­er,” the term used to describe a guer­ril­la com­bat­ant who fought against pro-slave inter­ests. Iron­i­cal­ly, he was part of a Kansas unit that had sacked Quantrill’s home­town of Osce­o­la. But in ear­ly ’63 he was autho­rized to raise a reg­i­ment of African Amer­i­can infantry that became the South Car­oli­na. Dur­ing the remain­der of the war, he prop­a­gat­ed his Kansas-bred form of mur­der and plun­der through­out South Car­oli­na, Geor­gia and Florida.

September 19, 1863 Danville North Star

From the Potomac Army

New York, Sept 13 – The Times cor­re­spon­dent of the Army of the Potomac writes on the 10th that it is believed that one corps, or about one third of the [Con­fed­er­ate] army under Longstreet, is mov­ing to Rich­mond, there to be trans­ferred, two divi­sions of it to the South­west and one to Charleston…This seems to indi­cate that the rebels in Vir­ginia will remain entire­ly upon the defen­sive for the com­ing cam­paign, which every­one here counts upon before winter.

Spe­cial dis­patch­es from Wash­ing­ton, state that Mrs. Leach, wife of the Super­in­ten­dent of the Tredgar Iron Works [The facil­i­ty in Vir­ginia where the South man­u­fac­tured and ser­viced its ships for their wartime navy.] has arrived from Rich­mond. The evac­u­a­tion of East Ten­nessee by rebel forces caused the great­est sur­prise and gloom in Rich­mond, as all were antic­i­pat­ing a bat­tle there instead of a peace­able occu­pa­tion of Union forces. Troops from Lee’s army have been quite freely in Rich­mond. Their des­ti­na­tion is unknown. There was a gen­er­al belief that Charleston would be captured.

***

Braxton_Bragg
Con­fed­er­ate Brax­ton Bragg, who was defeat­ed by Rosencrans.

The sweep of the rebels out of East Ten­nessee is cred­it­ed to Gen­er­al William Rose­crans, who, serv­ing under U.S. Grant, man­aged to out­flank his Con­fed­er­ate coun­ter­part, Brax­ton Bragg, in Chat­tanooga with a min­i­mum of casu­al­ties. How­ev­er the screw would soon turn in the oth­er direc­tion in what is now known as the Chicka­mau­ga campaign.

September 26, 1863 Danville North Star

The War

Our war record this week does not present so cheer­ing an aspect as it did last. We have no accounts of any favor­able progress at Charleston. The siege, on our part, appears to be at a stand-still, while the Con­fed­er­ates ever active, are strain­ing every nerve by way of for­ti­fy­ing the approach­es to the city, and it is evi­dent that Charleston can­not be speed­i­ly cap­tured. It is said that we can burn the city – but would that essen­tial­ly aid us in over­com­ing the great mil­i­tary strength of the rebels? That is what is want­ed in this war – breakup and destroy the mil­i­tary pow­er of the Con­fed­er­ate – all favor­able results would fol­low as a mat­ter of course. …

General Rosecrans
Gen­er­al Rosecrans

But the worst news, this week, is from the army of Gen. Rose­crans. He fought a great bat­tle – sev­en hours long – in Geor­gia, and is report­ed – “bad­ly whipped,” as the report says. If this is so, it will mate­ri­al­ly affect our late suc­cess­es in East Ten­nessee, and per­haps cause our troops to aban­don Knoxville, and our mil­i­tary pos­ses­sions in that quarter.

***

Still Lat­er

***

Wash­ing­ton, Sept 21 – The Nation­al Repub­li­can says the ene­my attacked Gen. Rose­crans again Sun­day morning…The bat­tle raged fiercely…

[T]wo and only two of Gen. Rose­crans divi­sions were in utter hav­oc and con­fu­sion. But 8,000 to 10,000 of these had been ral­lied and got back to their places, while the remain­der of the army had not giv­en way or retreat­ed, and at the last moment was dri­ving the advance of the rebel army back….

The num­ber of killed and wound­ed on both sides will prob­a­bly not fall short of 30,000…

It has been offi­cial­ly ascer­tained that he has fall­en back to Chat­tanooga, to await the arrival of Burnside’s forces which were yes­ter­day with­in 30 miles and were expect­ed to be up with him to-day when a for­ward move­ment would be made upon the lines of the ene­my. The utmost con­fi­dence is felt here upon the junc­tion of Burn­side, when the ene­my would be bad­ly beat­en and com­pelled to fall back upon Rome and Atlanta.

***

Gen­er­al Rose­crans had a prick­ly per­son­al­i­ty and like most every oth­er high rank­ing offi­cer in the Union army, except per­haps Grant, was seen by the frus­trat­ed Lin­coln as unag­gres­sive and painstak­ing­ly slow. So it was time to take his leave after his defeat at Chickamauga.

Although the bat­tle was a loss, it was not an unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter due in part to a blue-eyed gen­er­al by the name of George Thomas, who col­lect­ed his troops and pro­vid­ed a stal­wart defense as Rose­crans skedad­dled back to Chat­tanooga. Thomas became known as the “Rock of Chicka­mau­ga” for his efforts.

It was now time for Rose­crans to give up his seat in the game of “gen­er­al musi­cal chairs.” The seat’s new occu­pant was to become Gen­er­al George Thomas, tapped by Grant, to take on his West Point class­mate and col­league in the Mex­i­can Amer­i­can War, Gen­er­al Brax­ton Bragg. Both were pro­fes­sion­al sol­diers and cer­ti­fied mem­bers of the old boys’ club that pop­u­lat­ed the ranks of US mil­i­tary before the war began.

 

Share